Why There is a Myth?

The myth likely stems from a misunderstanding of the scriptural references to varna and their misinterpretation over time. The original concept of varna in the scriptures was based on occupation and personal qualities, not birth.

What's the Truth?

In Sanatan Dharma, the concept of varna was initially meant to be a flexible classification based on one's occupation and inherent qualities. This system was intended to organize society efficiently, not to restrict or discriminate.

Varna vs. Caste System

• Varna System: The varna system, as mentioned in scriptures like the Bhagavad Gita, categorizes society into four groups based on occupation and qualities - Brahmins (teachers and priests), Kshatriyas (warriors and rulers), Vaishyas (traders and agriculturists), and Shudras (service providers). This system was fluid and based on one's abilities and actions.
• Distortion into Caste System: Over time, this flexible system became rigid and hereditary, transforming into the caste system. This rigid caste system, based on birth, is not supported by the original teachings of Sanatan Dharma.

Scriptural References

• Bhagavad Gita: The Bhagavad Gita mentions the varna system as being based on qualities and actions (guna and karma), not birth.
• Rigveda: The Rigveda, one of the oldest texts, does mention social groups but does not advocate for a rigid, birth-based caste system.

Modern Interpretations and Relevance

• Contemporary Understanding: Modern scholars and spiritual leaders of Sanatan Dharma often emphasize the original, flexible nature of varna and criticize the rigid caste system as a societal corruption.
• Global Perspective: The discussion around caste and varna in Sanatan Dharma has gained international attention, with many advocating for a return to the more equitable and flexible varna system.